PROSPERR.IO

In today’s hiring landscape, education benefits have quietly become a big differentiator. Whether it’s reimbursing school fees, helping with admissions, or offering access to a company-run school, these perks matter. And with the cost of good schools climbing fast (₹2–5 lakhs a year isn’t unusual in cities like Delhi), this kind of support can genuinely ease pressure on families.

But here’s the catch. From a tax perspective, the government doesn’t see these benefits as “nice extras.” Any free or subsidised education provided by an employer to an employee’s family is treated as part of the employee’s salary. That means it can attract tax.

This is where Rule 3(5) of the Income-tax Rules comes in. For CHROs, finance teams, and tax advisors, this rule shows up more often than expected, usually when payroll numbers don’t match Form 16 or when employees raise questions during return filing. Understanding it upfront helps avoid TDS mismatches, awkward corrections, and unnecessary penalties and it also makes it easier to structure education benefits more efficiently.

Understanding Educational Perquisites for Employees

Section 17(2)(ii) of the Income-Tax Act deems free/concessional education for "household members" (spouse, children, including step/adopted, parents, servants, dependents) as perquisites, taxed under "Salary." Rule 3(5) specifies valuation, distinct from cash allowances (fully taxable) or LTC (exempt).

Key principle:
Benefit = Employer's cost or market equivalent, minus recoveries. Exemptions cap at modest thresholds, promoting equity.

How Educational Perks Are Valued for Tax Purposes

Rule 3(5) uses a two-tier approach, prioritizing actual costs while benchmarking against local markets.

1. Direct Fee Payments and Reimbursements

The primary valuation is equal to the total expenditure by the employer on tuition, books, uniforms, hostel, and transport(directly or reimbursed). The scope here covers spouse, children (all ages), parents, servants, and dependents. If you have multiple kidst then aggregating per child is recommended. Reimbursements is there if the employer pays the school directly or refunds the employee, it's included.

Example: Tech firm reimburses ₹2.5 lakhs for the employee's son's ICSE school. Taxable value: ₹2.5 lakhs (added to CTC).

2. Company-Run Schools and Benchmarking Fees

For institutions owned/maintained by employer (e.g., company schools) or other institutions via employment linkage (e.g., quota seats due to parent's role):

• Value = Cost of similar education in a comparable local institution.
• Comparable? Similar curriculum, facilities, reputation (e.g., CBSE vs. ICSE).
• Locality test: Nearest urban center; use fee structures from 3-5 peers.

Example 2: PSU maintains a school (internal cost ₹50,000/child). Local private school charges ₹1.2 lakhs. Taxable value: ₹1.2 lakhs/child.

3. Adjusting Taxable Value by Employee Payments

Net value = Gross value - Amounts paid/recovered from employee (pre-year-end).

Let's take an example of ABC Ltd. which spends ₹30,000/child on fees; recovers ₹20,000. Perquisite: ₹10,000. Scale to 2 kids: ₹20,000 total.

Example: Calculating Taxable Education Benefits

Specific Exemptions: ₹1,000/child/month Thresholds

Rule 3(5) carves out relief for modest benefits—exempt if ≤ ₹1,000 per child per month (₹12,000/year/child)
 

Exemption 1: Employer-Owned/Maintained Institutions

Free facilities exempt up to the cap, regardless of actual cost.

Example: Company kindergarten costs ₹15,000/child/year internally. Exempt (under ₹12,000).

Exemption 2: Other Institutions

Applies if perks stem from employment (e.g., legacy admissions). Value still benchmarked locally, but exempt ≤ ₹1,000/month/child.

Limits: One child? Full cap. Twins? ₹12,000 each. No cap on kids, but per-child basis.

Pro Tip: Exceeding cap? Tax entire value (no pro-rating). Document via fee receipts/school letters.

Case Study: Multinational reimburses ₹15,000/year for 2 kids in a tied school (local cost ₹18,000). Exempt: Yes (₹12,500 total < cap? Wait—₹15,000 > ₹12,000/child? No: per child check. Adjust recoveries to fit.

Mistakes to Avoid and Special Cases

• Pitfall 1: "Concessional" misread, any discount/reimbursement counts.
• Pitfall 2: Multiple institutions value each separately.
• Pitfall 3: Higher education (college), same rules; IIT quotas taxable post-cap.
  

Advanced Case: Executive's kid in employer-affiliated international school (local equiv. ₹5L). Value: ₹5L - ₹1L recovery = ₹4L taxable. Employee plans: Switch to loan (80E deduction).

Conclusion

Rule 3(5) ensures equitable taxation of educational perks: employer spends or local comparables form the base, slashed by recoveries, with a generous ₹1,000/child/month exemption for owned/other facilities. Employers thrive on precise tracking and policies; employees on awareness and contributions.

Explore Flexi Benefits with a Free Demo!

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Are employer-provided education benefits taxable?

Yes. Free or subsidized education for employees’ children, spouse, or dependents is considered a taxable perquisite under Section 17(2)(ii).

2. How is the taxable value of education benefits calculated?

Rule 3(5) values the benefit at the employer’s actual cost or the market equivalent for similar local institutions, minus any recovery from the employee.

3. Are any education benefits exempt from tax?

Yes. Modest perks ≤ ₹1,000 per child per month (₹12,000/year/child) at employer-owned/maintained or linked schools are exempt from tax.

4. Do reimbursements for school fees count as taxable income?

Yes. Any reimbursement by the employer, whether direct payment or refund to the employee, is included in taxable salary after accounting for exemptions.

5. How should companies track and report education perquisites?

Employers must maintain documentation of fees, recoveries, and valuation benchmarks. Accurate reporting ensures correct TDS, Form 16 reflection, and compliance with Rule 3(5).

[Disclaimer: The article is only for educational purposes and is not to be construed as tax advice. The relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act may be referred to, for a complete understanding.]